FindTrial
Sign In

The comparison of propopfol alone versus propofol in combination with other medication for sedation in Endoscopic Ultrasonograph

The comparison of propopfol alone versus propofol with ketamine and propofol with fentanyl for sedation in Endoscopic Ultrasound

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2016/11/007463
Enrollment
180
Registered
2016-11-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA I,II and III patients scheduled for Endoscopic Ultrasound

Interventions

Intervention1: ketamine with propofol: single ketamine dose @ 1mg/kg initial bolus, followed by propofol bolus at 2mg/kg continued @ 50 - 200 microgm/kg/min till end of the procedure Intervention2: pr

Sponsors

ILBS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA physical status I,II and III patients scheduled for day care endoscopic ultrasongraphy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate in the study. History of allergy to propofol. Patients having cardiac disease, impaired renal function,uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction, patients on antipsychotic medication Pregnant and lactating mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary end point of the study is successful completion of endoscopic procedure under sedationTimepoint: The primary end point of the study is successful completion of endoscopic procedure under sedation AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
time to discharge within 2 hoursTimepoint: every 15 mins upto 2hous after the procedure—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShweta A Singh

ILBS

drshwetasingh29@gmail.com9810625177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026