Comparison of 2 different blades (one with videocamera and other without camera) to place the tube in the trachea for anaesthesia in children below 1 year of age.

Comparison of CMAC videolaryngoscope with conventional miller blade for intubation in lateral position in neonates and infants

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2016/10/007407

Enrollment

Registered

2016-10-25

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia

Interventions

Intervention1: CMAC group: Child will be intubated with CMAC MILLER videolaryngoscope in lateral position Control Intervention1: Miller laryngoscope: child will be intubated in lateral position with m

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: neonates and infants undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal tube placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: raised intracranial pressure, high risk forpulmonary aspiration of gastric contents such asgastric outlet obstruction and bowel stasis, coagulopathyand presence of any pathology of head and neck would be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Intubation difficulty scoreTimepoint: 1 minute after intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken to intubate, laryngoscopic view, ease of intubation and success rate of intubationTimepoint: 1 minute after intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Divya Jain

Poatgraduate Institute of medical education and research

jaindivya77@rediffmail.com7087008020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026