A Comparative Evaluation of two devices for airway patency in Children undergoing Daycare Surgery

A Comparative Evaluation of Ambu Aura Gain with ProSeal LMA in Children undergoing Daycare Surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2016/08/007202

Enrollment

Registered

2016-08-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Paediatric patients for day care surgeries

Interventions

Intervention1: Ambu aura gain: After randomization and following standard induction, the airway of the patients in this group will be secured with Ambu aura gain. following parameters will be compared

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.ASA I to II children 2.Elective daycare procedure under general anaesthesia 3. weight 5 to 30kg.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ASA III / IV 2.Parent / guardian refusal 3.Patient not fulfilling ASA fasting guideline 4.Head and neck surgery and difficult airway 5.Children with sore throat or upper respiratory infection ï?· Position other than supine

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP)Timepoint: To compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Ease of insertion 2.Insertion time 3.Number of attempts 4. Fibreoptic laryngeal view 5. Intraoperative and postoperative complicationsTimepoint: From induction of anaesthesia to till the patient is discharged home from the daycare unit	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRachna Bhutani

SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL

rachnabhutani@ymail.com09811199484

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026