Skip to content

A comparative study between Arthroscopy Treatment with Open Treatment for Proximal tibial fracture

To compare the results of Arthroscopy Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation(ARIF) with Open and Internal Fixation(ORIF) for tibial plateau fracture

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2016/08/007170
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-08-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patient having tibial plateau fracture of age 15 to 60 year

Interventions

Intervention1: Group 1-Arthroscopic assisted internal fixation (ARIF): In group 1-during surgery reduction of fracture and elevation of depressed fracture was achieved under arthroscopic visualization

Sponsors

Northern Railway Central Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with closed tibial plateau fracture of age group 15 to 60 year admitted in our hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1]Patients of age group 60 year. 2]Patient with pathologic fracture, open fracture, significant pre-existing degenerative joint disease, severe head injury (initial Glasgow coma scale score of 3]Patients not willing to participate in study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of arthroscopy assisted reduction and fixation with open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau Fracture Timepoint: . To study the results of arthroscopy assisted reduction and fixation of tibial plateau fractures in term of clinical and radiological outcomes . To study the results of open reduction & internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures clinical and radiological outcomes . To compare the results of arthroscopy assisted reduction and internal fixation with open reduction and internal fixation for tibial plateau fracture clinical and radiological outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare parameters in terms of pain, duration of surgery, hospital stay, flexion of knee, complications if anyTimepoint: . pain . duration of surgery . hospital stay . flexion of knee complications if any

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR MUNDE RAJIV MANIK

Northern Railway Central Hospital

rkmanocha@rediffmail.com9717630561

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026