REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION(LTS-II); STANDARD INSERTION TECHNIQUE VERSUS TWO MODIFIED INSERTION TECHNIQUES FOR PATIENTS WITH A SIMULATED DIFFICULT AIRWAY

REUSABLE LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION ;STANDARD TECHNIQUE VERSUS TWO MODIFIED TECHNIQUES IN patients with simulated difficult airway - laryngeal tube suction

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2016/08/007127

Enrollment

144

Registered

2016-08-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- healthy

Interventions

Intervention1: GROUP b: Group B Insertion will be attempted with head on flat surface ( no pillow) and the patients head and neck being stabilized by an assistant who will hold the sides of neck a

Insertion will be attempted with head on flat surface ( no pillow) and the patients head and neck being stabilized by an assistant who will hold the sides of neck and the mastoid process ( manual

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: either sex Age 18-75 years ASA Grade I and II,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI >35kg/m2 Known airway or esophageal pathology Patients with known or predicted difficult airway Upper Respiratory Tract infection in previous 10days Patients at preoperative increased risk of aspiration Pathological conditions of upper respiratory tract or upper gastrointestinal tract Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary aim of the study will be to compare the success rate of the insertion of laryngeal tube suction -II in patients with simulated difficult airway using manual inline stbililization in two attempts or records it as failure by anesthesia personnel Timepoint: STARTS AFTER THE PLACEMENT OF DEVICE AND CONFIRMATION OF ITS successful placement in two attempts	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Outcome TimePoints Time to place LTSII in seconds Number of attempts needed to place ease of insertion of device 0/1/2/3/4 attempts and grading of gastric tube insertion 0/1/2 oropharyngeal leak pressures pressures at 5 minutes blood or gastric secretions on the device Any airway morbidity Intraoperative complications post operative complications and airway morbidity number and type of manipulation required to insert the deviceTimepoint: time reqiured in seconds to place the device number of attempts allowed two only oropharyngeal leak pressure will be seen 5 minutes after placement of device	—

Measure

Time frame

Outcome TimePoints Time to place LTSII in seconds Number of attempts needed to place ease of insertion of device 0/1/2/3/4 attempts and grading of gastric tube insertion 0/1/2 oropharyngeal leak pressures pressures at 5 minutes blood or gastric secretions on the device Any airway morbidity Intraoperative complications post operative complications and airway morbidity number and type of manipulation required to insert the deviceTimepoint: time reqiured in seconds to place the device number of attempts allowed two only oropharyngeal leak pressure will be seen 5 minutes after placement of device

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRajesh Mahajan

govt medical college jammu

drmahajanr@rediffmail.com9419141263

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026