FindTrial
Sign In

Is Continuous temperature monitoring of newborn babies better than intermittent monitoring of temperature â?? A initial study.

Continuous versus Intermittent monitoring of Temperature in Infants â?? A pilot study - CITI study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2016/04/006817
Enrollment
90
Registered
2016-04-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Continuous temperature measured by 98.6 Fever-watch kit with intermittent monitoring in the three groups Health Condition 2: P073- Preterm [premature] newborn [other]

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Helyxon Healthcare solutions P Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Three group of study population 1. Term baby 2. Late preterm (34-36weeks of post menstrual age) 3. Preterm babies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Babies with congenital malformations or syndromes 2. Babies with clinical sepsis or proven sepsis and on IV antibiotics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Detection of abnormal body temperature defined as a. Cold stress - 36 C to 36.4 C b.Hypothermia below 36 C c. Hyperthermia above 37.4 CTimepoint: 24 hours - 48 hours of monitoring—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The temperature measured by fever-watch should be within 0.50C compared with the axillary measured during intermittent monitoring by digital thermometer.Timepoint: 24-48 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ashok C

Sri Ramachandra University

shajanabasraar@gmail.com45928611

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026