Skip to content

A clinical study with random allocation of young cancer patients having fever with low neutrophil blood count for comparing the safety and cost-effectiveness of early stoppage of antibiotic without neutrophil count recovery versus with neutrophil count recovery in these patients

A prospective randomized study comparing the safety and cost-effectiveness of antibiotic discontinuation without neutrophil recovery (ECIL approach) versus with neutrophil recovery (IDSA strategy) in young febrile-neutropenic patients with cancer - HRFN study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2016/02/006618
Enrollment
100
Registered
2016-02-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- High Risk Febrile Neutropenia pediatric cancer patients

Interventions

Intervention1: Arm A-ECIL(Expert Group of the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia) approach Arm-B (Infectious Diseases Society of America) approach: Arm-A: , empiric intravenous antibiot

Sponsors

Dr Brijesh Arora
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Subjects with ages 2 to 24 years (2) Receiving chemotherapy for a) newly diagnosed, relapsed or secondary AML; b) newly diagnosed ALL in induction or delayed intensification c) relapsed ALL in induction, consolidation, or intensification; d) advanced stage Burkitt lymphoma in induction or consolidation of LMB protocol. (3) Febrile neutropenia defined as fever (temperature � 38�C on two occasions within a 12 hour period or � 38.3�C once) during neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (4) At days 3-5, (A) meet criteria for antibiotic cessation consisting of: a) absence of fever (38.0° C) for at least 24 hours; (b) absence of a clinically or microbiologically documented infection for which antibiotic treatment after day 5 of febrile neutropenia would be required; and (c) absence of major co-morbidity such as severe grade 3 or greater (via CTCAE version 4.0) severe mucositis or abdominal pain, vomiting, hypotension, respiratory distress, or neurological signs or symptoms and (B) remain neutropenic with an absolute neutrophil count

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Previous enrollment on the trial (2) Renal insufficiency on day 1 of febrile neutropenia defined via a calculated creatinine clearance < 70mL/min/1.73m2 or a higher than normal serum creatinine based on age/gender.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the reduction in antibiotic use by comparing the duration of intravenous antibiotics in 2 armsTimepoint: During inpatient admission for incidences of febrile neutropenia

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To describe the differences between the two groups of patients in the following outcome measures of interest: 1. Proportion with successful episodes 2. Proportion with morbidity 3. Proportion with complications 4. Cost of care 5. Febrile neutropenia related mortality 6. Proportion with nephrotoxicity 7. Proportion with a delay in chemotherapy secondary to infection or neutropeniaTimepoint: During inpatient admission for incidences of febrile neutropenia

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Brijesh Arora

Tata Memorial Hospital

brijesh.aurora@gmail.com912224177220

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026