FindTrial
Sign In

RANDOMISED CONTROL STUDY TO FIND THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS LARYNGOSCOPIES IN TERMS OF INTUBATION RESPONSE

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY COMPARING THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION WITH McCOY, MACINTOSH AND CMAC LARYNGOSCOPE IN ADULT PATIENTS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/08/006131
Enrollment
90
Registered
2015-08-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- adult patients coming for general surgical procedures under general anesthesia of ASA I physical status

Interventions

Intervention1: intubation response with macintosh laryngoscopy: hemodynamic response to intubation after induction of general anesthesia by using macintosh blade laryngoscope Control Intervention1: in

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I patients posted for surgical procedures under general anesthesia of age 18-40 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • ASA II and above • Pregnancy • Emergency surgery • Airway abnormalities and anticipated difficult airway • Laryngoscopy lasting for >30 seconds. • More than one attempt at intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To study and compare the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with different laryngoscopes such as the Macintosh, McCoy and C MAC video laryngoscope in adult patients posted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and oral endotracheal intubation.Timepoint: 10minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVENKATESH SELVARAJ

SRI RAMACHANDRA UNIVERSITY

faizabuhari@gmail.com044-26791297

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026