Health Condition 1: null- Insertion characteristics, sealing pressure and quality of airway maintenance with i-gel versus LMA supreme in children
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria 1. ASA-I and II 2. Either sex 3. Age group 3 months to 8 years
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age group 3 months and 8 years 2. ASA III and above 3. Non starved patients 4. Patients with increased risk of regurgitation-e.g. hiatus hernia, intestinal obstruction, sepsis 5. History of extrinsic or intrinsic airway obstruction due to trauma/mass/caustic substance ingestion 6. Potential difficult airways 7. Upper gastrointestinal tract surgeries in the past 8. Patients with esophageal pathology/Gastroesophageal reflux disease 9. Head and neck surgery 10. Upper respiratory tract infection like fever, cough, rhinorrhoea, croup, sore throat 11. Patients with poor lung compliance 12. Bleeding/clotting abnormality
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel with LMA-Supreme in children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Comparison is with respect to: 1. Ease of insertion 2. Number of attempts for insertion 3. Seal pressure/Airway leak pressure 4. Quality of airway maintenance during anaesthesiaTimepoint: 1. Ease of insertion will be noted one time immediately after insertion of the device 2. Number of attempts for insertion will be noted one time immediately after failure of previous attempt/attempts. 3. Seal pressure/Airway leak pressure will be noted one time immediately after insertion of the device. 4. Quality of airway maintenance during anaesthesia every 5 minutes till procedure is completed | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1.Airway interventions required for insertion 2.Incidence of gastric insufflation 3.Ease of insertion of gastric tube 4.Number of manipulations required to maintain patent airway 5.ComplicationsTimepoint: 1.Airway interventions required for insertion noted one time after insertion of the device 2.Incidence of gastric insufflation noted one time after insertion of the device 3.Ease of insertion of gastric tube noted one time after insertion of the device 4.Number of manipulations required to maintain patent airway will be noted every 5 minutes during the procedure. 5. Complications will be monitored during procedure every 5 minutes and hourly till discharge of patients. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Lokamanya Tilak Municipal Medical College