FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of two drugs for sedation of pediatric dental patients

comparative evaluation of propofol alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in anxious and uncooperative pediatric dental patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/07/006019
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-07-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- early childhood caries

Interventions

Intervention1: Dexmedetomidine and propofol: 1ug/kg IV for 10mins, 50ug/kg/min IV for 40mins Control Intervention1: propofol: 1mg/kg IV bolus followed by 50ug/kg/min IV infusion for 40mins

Sponsors

Post graduate institute of medical education and research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of caries in a pair of maxillary incisor venhams anxiety score of 4/5 ASA-I physical status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: medically compromised, any contraindication for sedation, allergy to drugs being used

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
total propofol used in the two groupsTimepoint: 40 mins period—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
induction,recovery time, additional propofol boluses, vital signs, analgesic requirement post-op.Timepoint: 5mins interval—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactFerah Rehman

post graduate institute of medical education and research

ashimapgi@yahoo.in

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026