Skip to content

A Clinical study to evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 2% Rebamipide ophthalmic suspension Vs 0.1 % Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic solution for treatment of patients with Dry Eye

A Multicentric, Double Blind, Randomized, Active Control, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 2% Rebamipide Ophthalmic Suspension Vs. 0.1 % Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic solution for treatment of patients with Dry Eye.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/05/005783
Enrollment
200
Registered
2015-05-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- For the treatment of Dry Eye signs and symptoms. Health Condition 2: H041- Other disorders of lacrimal gland

Interventions

Intervention1: 2% Rebamipide ophthalmic suspension: 1 drop in affected eye(s) Four times daily for 24 weeks Control Intervention1: 0.1 % Sodium Hyaluronate: 1 drop in affected eye(s) Four times daily

Sponsors

Ajanta Pharma Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.A clinical diagnosis Dry Eye at least since from 20 months. 2.Anesthetized Schirmer test score of 0 to 9 mm per 5minutes or less or tear breakup time is 5 seconds or less. 3.Best corrected visual acuity of 0.2 or better in both eyes. 4.Voluntary willingness to give written informed consent prior to participation in trial. 5.Wash out period for subjects who are on medications for same condition will be 3 days.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Any active inflammation of eyes. 2.Any long lasting inflammation of eyes. 3.Subject with block nasal duct. 4.Subjects with history of recurrent corneal erosions diagnosed by slit lamp examination. 5.Subjects with history of epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. 6.Subjects with history of floppy eyelid syndrome diagnosed by Slit lamp examination 7.Subjects with history of Conjunctivochalasis diagnosed by slit lamp examination 8.Anterior segment disease like Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. 9.Using Cyclosporine since long time 10.Use of contact lenses 11.Use of topically instilled Ocular medication during study. 12.History of Ocular surgery within 12 months. 13.Females who are pregnant, lactating, or child bearing potential. 14.Females who are not willing to remain abstinent or use contraception. 15.Subjects who are on systemic Hormonal or corticosteroid therapy. 16.Subjects with history of Diabetes Mellitus. 17.Presence of Stevens Johnson Syndrome. 18.Ocular surgery due to Dry eye Syndrome. 19.Use of topical &/or systemic treatment potentially interfering with tear production. 20.Concurrent involvement in another study or previous receipt of same drug. 21.Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subjectâ??s safety or trial parameters. 22.Known contraindications or sensitivities to the study medication or its components. 23.Other patients who are in the opinion of the investigator/sub investigator were inappropriate for the study participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine Efficacy of 2% Rebamipide Ophthalmic Suspension compared to 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate for the treatment of patients with Dry eye.Timepoint: Day1, 4th week, 8th week, 12thweek, 16th week, 20thweek, 24thweek

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
â?¢To determine Safety and Tolerability of 2% Rebamipide Ophthalmic Suspension Compared to 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate in patients with Dry eye â?¢Global assessment of study medication by Investigators and Patients Timepoint: Day1, 4th week, 8th week, 12thweek, 16th week, 20thweek, 24thweek

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shailesh Singh

Ajanta Pharma Ltd

shailesh.singh@ajantapharma.com022-6062111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026