Skip to content

To evaluate the functional and structural changes, as well as all collateral effects, induced with micropulse laser in comparision to the standard laser and intravitreal injection in the management of patients with diabetic macular edema. Benefit of the micropulse laser will be better safety

Micropulse Laser versus standard Laser in Diabetic Macular Edema - MILE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/03/005628
Enrollment
180
Registered
2015-03-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- clinically significant center involved diabetic macular edema

Interventions

Intervention1: Micropulse Yellow-577nm laser photo-stimulation : Early Treatment Diabetic Macular Edema Study Intervention2: Micropulse Yellow-577nm laser: Micropulse Yellow-577nm laser photo-stimula

Sponsors

LV Prasad Eye Institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients (aged >=18 years) with type 1 or 2 diabetes and DME. Decreased vision due to center-involved CS-DME and not to other causes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/400 (no less than 21 ETDRS letter score) and worse that 20/40 (no more than 69 ETDRS letter score) Increased foveal thickening due to DME and not explained by any other cause. Central macular thickness (CMT) >= 250 microns (central subfield), measured with Zeiss Cirrus OCT. Leakage and/or microaneurysms on Fluorescein angiography (FA) in the area of retina thickening. HbA1C Willingness and ability to understand and sign a written informed consent. Willingness and ability to return for all study visits within required visits windows.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Marked macular ischemia or severe perifoveal inter capillary loss on FA Marked peripheral ischemia for which panretinal photocoagulation is required or should be considered Retinal thickening due to epiretinal membranes or vitreomacular traction History of panretinal laser photocoagulation performed within 6 months History of Focal/grid laser treatment that received within 4 months or injections received within 3 months Intraocular surgery within 12 months Preexisting ocular condition that precludes visual improvement despite resolution of the macular edema (e.g. Severe or poorly controlled glaucoma) Unstable medical status including glycemic control and blood pressure. Co-morbidities such as retinal vein occlusion (RVO,) age related macular degeneration (AMD), Glaucoma, Rubeosis and other retinovascular diseases. Media opacity, which doesnâ??t allow complete ocular examination and proposed measurements. Dilation of pupil less than 5 mm. Any condition that might interfere with assessment of the progression of macular edema; Hypertension under treatment, showing values of blood pressure higher than 90 mmHg (diastolic blood pressure), or > 165 mmHg (systolic blood pressure).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) on ETDRS chart Timepoint: 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Central Macular Thickness (CMT) on SD-OCT ( Zeiss Cirrus) Percentage of patients gaining 5, 10, or 15 or more letters from baseline Percentage of patients losing 5, 10, or 15 or more letters from baseline Central 12º retinal sensitivity (CRS) changes on microperimetry. contrasensitivity (change from baseline) Laser induced changes discernable on fundus auto florescence Need for retreatment Any adverse collateral effect Need for retreatment Timepoint: 1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Raja Narayanan

L V Prasad Eye Institute

narayanan@lvpei.org04030612618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026