Skip to content

Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Acotiamide 100 mg Tablets with Placebo in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia.

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicentre, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Acotiamide 100 mg Tablets with Placebo in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/02/005557
Enrollment
222
Registered
2015-02-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Functional Dyspepsia

Interventions

Intervention1: Acotiamide Hydrochloride Hydrate: Acotiamide Hydrochloride Hydrate 100 mg tablets of Lupin Ltd. Patients will receive either Acotiamide 100 mg tablets or placebo tablets three times dai

Sponsors

LUPIN Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Diagnosed as Functional Dyspepsia â?? Postprandial Distress Syndrome as defined by the Rome III classification 2.Patients with at least one of the following two symptoms for at least 6 months • Postprandial fullness • Early satiety OR Patients with two or more of the following symptoms at a moderate or severe level within the previous 3 months (At least one symptom of postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating or early satiety should be included): • Upper abdominal pain • Upper abdominal discomfort • Postprandial fullness • Upper abdominal bloating • Early satiety • Nausea • Vomiting • Excessive belching 3. Patients with coexisting epigastric pain syndrome symptoms (epigastric pain, epigastric burning) may be included, but the symptom causing the most distress at the time of screening should be one of the following meal-related symptoms: postprandial fullness, upper abdominal bloating or early satiation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Subjects with any structural disease of esophagus, stomach or duodenum that is likely to explain the symptoms. 2.History of heartburn within 12 weeks prior to screening and during the 7 days of baseline period 3.Any gastrointestinal co-morbidity like irritable bowel syndrome which may confound the evaluation of symptoms 4.Presence of any severe or malignant disease 5.Patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall Treatment Efficacy (OTE) at the end of 4 weeks treatment periodâ?? Global assessment will be done by patients using a questionnaire. This will be scored on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from â??extremely improved, improved, slightly improved, not changed, slightly aggravated, aggravated and extremely aggravatedâ?? as compared with the baseline periodTimepoint: NIL

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
â?¢Elimination rate (score 0) of each individual symptom at the end of 4 weeks treatment period and follow up period â?¢Elimination rate (score 0) of all three major symptoms i.e. Postprandial fullness, Upper abdominal bloating, and Early satiation at the end of 4 weeks treatment period and follow up periodTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chirag Shah

Lupin Limited

mangeshkamle@lupin.com02266402200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026