Skip to content

Effectiveness of Epalrestat in treatment of diabetic patients suffering due to damage of peripheral nerves.

A prospective, controlled, randomized, double blind, comparative, parallel, 2-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epalrestat (150 mg) compared to Methylcobalamine (1500 µg) in patients suffering from diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/02/005538
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-02-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Epalrestat: Epalrestat (150mg) :oral :once daily for maximum period of 90 days Control Intervention1: Methylcobalamin: Methylcobalamin (1500 µg) per orally for 90 days

Sponsors

Primary Investigator
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients of either sex in the age group between 20 to 70 years. 2. Diabetic patients stabilized on antidiabetic medication (on stable dose of antidiabetic drugs for the last 4 weeks) with stable glycemic control (HbA1c 2. 3. Subjects who provide a written informed consent to abide by the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with stage 3(N3)19i.e.disabling neuropathy or presence of symptoms/ Signs of foot ulcer. 2. Patients with diabetic neuropathy requiring hospital admission for management of neuropathy/ diabetic complications / any other disease conditions. 3. Patients presenting with primary cause of neurologic disorders other than diabetes (alcoholic neuropathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease). 4. Patients presenting with arteriosclerosis obliterans (ankle brachial pressure index of 5. Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients of the test / comparator formulation. 6. Patients with severe cardiac, hepatic, gastrointestinal, renal, pulmonary and skin diseases. 7. Patients with H/O alcohol/ drug abuse 8. Pregnant and lactating females. 9. Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or if they were receiving other experimental medications for diabetic neuropathy, prostaglandin E1 preparations, or any other medication that affects symptoms of diabetic neuropathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary efficacy end point will be: â?¢ Percent change in modified neuropathy disability score from baseline Timepoint: Efficacy parameters- 0, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety parameters: 1. ADR recording, 2. blood investigationsTimepoint: Safety parameters- 0, 90 days.;The secondary efficacy end points include: â?¢ Assessment of symptoms such as Loss of sensation Burning sensation Numbness Muscle cramp â?¢ Assessment of signs Tendon reflexes â?¢ Global assessment carried out by investigator at the end of 12 weeks. Timepoint: Efficacy parameters- 0, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sachin Devendrarao Shende

Govt. Medical College Aurangabad

sachindshende@yahoo.co.in09579016106

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026