FindTrial
Sign In

three different recording criterias were compared in terms of severity of dental fluorosis and to find out the most simple index for field studies.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT RECORDING SYSTEMS OF DENTAL FLUOROSIS IN CHILDREN OF A KNOWN FLUORIDE AREA OF HARYANA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/02/005495
Enrollment
300
Registered
2015-02-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- children with dental fluorosis were evaluated with different indices for recording dental fluorosis

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

oral Health Sciences Centre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: CHILDREN WITH DENTAL FLUOROSIS AND PERMANENT RESIDENT OF THE AREA WERE PREFERABLY INCLUDED IN THE STUDY.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: children with dental caries or restoration on occlusal and buccal surfaces of teeth were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ICMR photographic recording criteria is simple and less time consuming compared to other index.Timepoint: one year—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the applicability of Deans index,TSIF index and ICMR modified criteria in terms of severity of disease recordingTimepoint: each index was recorded at a gap of one month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNeeraj kumar

oral health sciences centre PGIMER Chandigarh

k_gauba@yahoo.co.in9815933743

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026