FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of early versus late artificial rupture of membrane in induced labour

EARLY VERSUS LATE AMNIOTOMY DURING INDUCED LABOUR

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/01/005418
Enrollment
150
Registered
2015-01-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Pregnant females in pre-labour stage

Interventions

Intervention1: early amniotomy: amniotomy in induced labour before startig oxytocin Control Intervention1: late amniotomy: amniotomy in induced labour after 4-6 hours of oxytocin infusion

Sponsors

PGIMER CHANDIGARH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Singleton pregnancy term gestation cephalic presentation with head fixed at brim Intact amniotic membranes Reactive non-stress test Bishopâ??s score >=6

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: maternal infection with HIV,hepatitis B or C Maternal fever at admission Severe intrauterine growth restriction severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia heart disease, severe anemia, uncontrolled diabetes, major medical illness previou uterine scar

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
induction-delivery interval.Timepoint: july 2013 to december 2014—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Rate ofcaesarean section 2.Maternal outcome (intra-partum fever, postpartum haemorrhage, postpartum fever, analgesic requirement) 3.Fetal and neonatal outcome (fetal distress, neonatal sepsis, NICU admission)Timepoint: july 2013 to december 2014—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anju Bala

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Research amd Education, Chandigarh, India

rashmibagga@gmail.com7087009349

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026