Skip to content

EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FDC OF THREE ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS VERSUS FDC OF TWO ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FDC OF THREE ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS VERSUS FDC OF TWO ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: AN OPEN LABEL, RANDOMIZED, COMPARATIVE, MULTICENTRIC STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2015/01/005408
Enrollment
300
Registered
2015-01-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Interventions

Intervention1: FDC Glimepiride, voglibose and extended release metformin hydrochloride tablets: FDC Glimepiride, voglibose and extended release metformin hydrochloride tablets (1+0.2+500) mg (2+0.2+5

Sponsors

Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The following points were considered for inclusion criteria in this study: 1.Male or female patients who were aged between 18 years to 65 years 2.Patients who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 3.Patients who had HbA1c ratio of>=7.5 and 4.Patients who had BMI of>=23 and 5.Patients who had postprandial blood glucose (2 hours post meal) concentration more than 200 mg/dl 6.Patients who were on treatment with stable dose of fixed dose combination of Glimepiride 1 mg + Metformin 500 mg twice daily OR fixed dose combination of Glimepiride 2 mg + Metformin 500 mg twice daily for at least 12 weeks before enrolment 7.Patients who willingly gave their informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The following points were considered for exclusion criteria in this study: 1.Pregnant, lactating women or women of childbearing age who were not willing to use an acceptable method of birth control during the study period 2.Patients who had type 1 diabetes 3.Patients who had fasting blood glucose concentration more than 270 mg/dl 4.Patients who had hypersensitivity to any of the investigational products 5.Patients who had significant renal or hepatic impairment 6.Patients who received long term insulin therapy ( 7.Patients who had history of acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis and lactic acidosis 8.Patients who were in a state of diabetic coma or pre coma 9.Patients who had severe infection or serious trauma 10.Alcohol abused patients 11.Patients who were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV category 12.Patients who had congestive heart failure to be treated 13.Patients who had inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal ulcers or chronic enteric diseases related to digestion and absorption 14.Patients who were judged unfit for this study by investigator 15.Patients who were receiving Miconazole

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in PPBG from baseline Change in HbA1c from baseline Timepoint: Time frame 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks Time frame 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in FBG Proportion of participants with HbA1c reduction of at least 1% at the end of 24 weeks Proportion of participants with PPBG 170 mg/dl at the end of 24 weeks Evaluation of Clinical Global Impression on Improvement (CGI-I). Timepoint: (Time frame: 12 weeks and 24 weeks) [Time frame: 24 weeks] [Time frame: 24 weeks] [Time frame: 4, 12, 24 weeks]

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMr Guruprasad Palekar

Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited

maulik.doshi@sunpharma.com02656615500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026