Intubation (placing a tube in the trachea to give anaesthesia) in patients having trauma on face using a laryngoscope with video assisted technology.

A COMPARISON OF TRUVIEW EVO2 LARYNGOSCOPE WITH MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERIES

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2014/12/005303

Enrollment

Registered

2014-12-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- having maxillofacial trauma

Interventions

Intervention1: Trueview laryngoscope.: intubation parameers for nasotracheal intubation in patients with maxillofacial injury using trueview laryngoscope. Control Intervention1: Macintosh laryngoscope

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient between ages,18 and 60, with diagnosis of facio-maxillary injuries requiring tracheal intubation and ASA grades of I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with laryngotracheal injuries, laryngeal edema/epiglottitis/laryngotracheobronchitis/basal skull fractures/CSF rhinorrhoea/bleeding disorders/nasal polyp, abscess or foreign body/adenoids and previous nasal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) scoreTimepoint: After intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
the rate of successful placement of the tracheal tube in the trachea in the first attempt, time for successful intubation, laryngoscopic view and number of optimizing maneuvers, duration of intubationTimepoint: Following nasotracheal intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDivya jain

PGIMER

jaindivya77@rediffmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026