Skip to content

When to take out laryngeal airway, a device used for anaesthesia

Optimum time of LMA ProSeal removal in adult patients: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/12/005302
Enrollment
90
Registered
2014-12-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients undergoing gynecologic surgery

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA ProSealâ?¢ removal after adequate reversal of muscle relaxation and end tidal MAC â?¤0.3: LMA ProSealâ?¢ removal after adequate reversal of muscle relaxation and end tidal MAC â?¤0.

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Female patients aged between 18-50yrsand ASA PS I-II undergoing elective short duration laparoscopic gynecological surgery ( <2 hrs) under general anesthesia using LMA ProSeal as airway device.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: I. Patientâ??s refusal II. ASA PS > II III. Possibility of difficult airway (mouth opening 35 cm, history of previous difficult airway) V. BMI > 30.00 or BMI VI. History of snoring or OSA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To find out the incidence of airway complications like airway obstruction (laryngospasm and biting of tube, snoring, oxyhemoglobin saturation 90%, stridor requiring airway manipulationTimepoint: To find out the incidence of airway complications like airway obstruction (laryngospasm and biting of tube, snoring, oxyhemoglobin saturation 90%, stridor requiring airway manipulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To find out the incidence of retching, nausea, vomiting and excessive salivation 2. To find the proportion of patients requiring CPAP, jaw thrust, or nasopharyngeal airway or reintubationin each group 3. To find out the hemodynamic changes associated with LMA ProSealâ?¢ extubation 4. To compare the operating theatre time between the two groups Timepoint: Just after LMA removal

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Dalim Kumar Baidya

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

dalimkumarb001@yahoo.co.in

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026