Skip to content

Comparative evaluation of formation of lost bone formation by two techniques

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BONE REGENERATION WITH BONE GRAFT AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, AND BONE GRAFT WITH LASER DE-EPITHELIALIZATION OF FLAP IN THE TREATMENT OF GRADE II FURCATION DEFECTS â?? A CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/12/005237
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-12-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Dr Prerna Krishan: PG Periodontics DAV dental college Yamunanagar Haryana Intervention2: Guided Tissue Regeneration membrane: Resorbable Type I Collagen Guided Tissue Regeneration membr

Sponsors

Prerna Krishan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis with radiographic evidence of atleast one facial/buccal furcation defect. 2.Age group -19 to 64 years. 3.Grade II furcation involvement in relation to Mandibular molars (Hampâ??s classification- Horizontal loss of periodontal support equal to or greater than 3mm but less than and or equal to 7 mm) . 4.Ability to maintain good oral hygiene (Oâ??Leary plaque score less than or equal to 20%). 5.Width of keratinized tissue more than or equal to 1 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes, on anti-coagulant therapy, immunosuppressive therapy and other systemic diseases or on drugs that contraindicate periodontal surgery. 2.Pregnant or lactating mothers. 3.History of smoking. 4.History of any periodontal therapy in the last 6 months. History of any endodontic therapy (root canal treatment) of the mandibular molars in the last 6 months. 5.Patients on medication/drugs interfering with periodontal treatment outcome. 6.Furcation at 3rd molars and untreated non-vital teeth. 7.Presence of cervical enamel projections, enamel pearls or bifurcational ridges on the molar teeth that cannot be removed. 8.Teeth with a horizontal crown mobility of more than 1mm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Obtaining a significant reduction in the soft tissue measurements 1.Plaque index 2. Gingival index 3. Pocket depth 4. Gingival recession 5. Horizontal probing depth at the furcation defect Gain in Clinical attachment level Assessed using a UNC 15 and nabers probe Timepoint: 3 month recall

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Obtaining a significant reduction in both soft tissue measurements(same as above) and hard tissue measurements of vertical and horizontal probing depth at the furcation defect by bone sounding Percentage of bone fill in the furcation defect viewed via RVG Timepoint: 6 month recall

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPrerna Krishan

D.A.V.(c) Dental College

drnymphea@yahoo.com9416493962

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026