Skip to content

a study to compare three different capping timings over artificially placed teeth

EVALUATION OF THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT LOADING PROTOCOLS â?? A COMPARATIVE RADIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/12/005236
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-12-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Edentulous Ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional loading: Conventional loading of dental implant with in a period of 3 months from implant placement Control Intervention1: Early loading: Early loading of dental implant wi

Sponsors

Priyanka Tikoo
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are cooperative, motivated and committed. 2. Patients with one or more missing teeth( not more than 3 teeth missing in one quadrant) and completely healed sites . 3. Patients with adequate amount of bone volumea and bone qualityb for implant placement. 4. Patients with good periodontal health in the remaining dentition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients unable/ unwilling to undergo minor oral surgical procedure. 2. Patients with any known systemic diseases/conditions and/or medication known to interfere with wound healing or minor surgical procedures. 3. Patients with allergy to any drug and/or material used in study. 4. Patients who are current smokers or consume any other form of tobacco. 5. Patients with insufficient inter-arch space to accommodate the required restorative component. 6. Patient unable to maintain adequate oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduced peri implant probing depth ,no implant mobility and no peri implant bone lossTimepoint: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months from date of loading

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Reduced Plaque index, Gingival index Reduced peri implant probing depth ,no implant mobility and no peri implant bone lossTimepoint: 6 months from date of loading

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPriyanka Tikoo

DAV DENTAL COLLEGE

drnymphea@yahoo.com7206894604

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026