FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare two different technique of Proseal LMA placement(tube in air passage).

Prospective study to compare two different technique of Proseal LMA placement.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/10/005136
Enrollment
120
Registered
2014-10-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- 1) Adult patients (18-80 years) in whom LMA insertion is planned 2) Belonging to ASA I and II posted for elective surgeries 3) Modified Mallampati Score I/II

Interventions

Intervention1: PLMA insertion with conventional technique using introducer (IT): Patients will be randomly allocated to either standard insertion technique using the introducer tool (IT) or the novel

Sponsors

Dr Sheila Nainan Myatra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: - 1) Adult patients (18-80 years) in whom LMA insertion is planned 2) Belonging to ASA I and II posted for elective surgeries 3) Modified Mallampati Score I/II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with 1) Any Contraindication for PLMA placement 2) Emergency Surgery 3) Anticipated difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First intubation success rateTimepoint: 6 Months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No of Intubation attempts Time taken for placement Complication rates Timepoint: 6 Months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sheila Nainan Myatra

Tata Memorial Hospital

drvijaykhandale@gmail.com09869743976

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026