To compare the outcomes of DSAEK(a type of endothelial corneal transplantation) using 350Âµm versus 400Âµm microkeratome blade in cases of corneal edema due to cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation

Visual and Refractive outcomes of Descemetâ??s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with 350Âµm versus 400Âµm microkeratome

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2014/09/005036

Enrollment

Registered

2014-09-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H181- Bullous keratopathy Health Condition 2: null- Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: DSAEK using 400 micron microkeratome head: 10 randomly selected patients of Psedophakic bullous keratopathy will be treated with DSAEK using 400 micron microkeratome head Control Interv

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Psedophakic bullous keratopathy abscence of stromal scarring pt willing to give written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: host thickness > 800 micron presence of stromal scarring

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
visual outcome refractive outcome Timepoint: 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
glare contrast post operative recovery time post operative complications Timepoint: 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNamrata Sharma

RPC,AIIMS

shreyansjainmamc@yahoo.com09555945681

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026