Skip to content

A clinical trial to study the efficacy of Negative Pressure Device (NPD) in traumatic paraplegia patients with bedsore.

â??A 12 week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial, comparing indigenized Negative Pressure Device (NPD) to standard wound care for the treatment of bedsores in traumatic paraplegia patients. - NPWT (Negative pressure wound therapy)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/09/005014
Enrollment
54
Registered
2014-09-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Bedsore

Interventions

Intervention1: Negative Pressure Device (NPD): Negative Pressure wound therapy by negative pressure device (NPD)is a vacuum assisted method for wound care that imparts a negative pressure of -60 to -1

Sponsors

Council of Science Technology
Lead Sponsor
Dr Amita Jain
Collaborator
Dr Rajiv Agarwal
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Sacral pressure sores in traumatic paraplegia patients with no signs of improvement and healing. 2. Stage III-IV pressure ulcer according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) 3. No clinical signs of active infection at the wound site and currently not on antibiotics. 4. Patients to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Candidate for surgery. 2. A wound with necrotic tissue unable to tolerate debridement. 3. Exposed blood vessels within the wound. 4. Chronic osteomyelitis (as determined by biopsy) or osteomyelitis that is not treatable by debridement and antibiotics. 5. Non-enteric or unexplored fistulae. 6. Wounds requiring homeostasis (i.e., that the flow of blood be stopped) for local bleeding. 7. Alternate etiology for non-healing. 8. Concomitant conditions that in the judgment of the investigator would make the subject inappropriate for entry to the study (e.g., malignancy in wound, malignancy less than 1-year disease free interval, previous or current irradiation, known immunodeficiency and/or major uncorrected medical disorders such as serious non-malignant disease, serious cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, palliative care or sickle cell disease) 9. Poor nutritional status as determined by a Braden Scale Nutritional Assessment score of 2 or 1 with a serum albumin 10. Currently taking medication that may interfere with wound healing (e.g., oral systemic steroids, immunosuppressive drugs, unfractionated heparin infusion) 11. Women who are currently pregnant or are breast feeding; or women of child bearing potential who are not currently taking adequate birth control

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time taken in healing (primary endpoint was a granulated wound or a wound ready for skin grafting or healing by secondary intention) 2. Rate of reduction of wound surface area and wound depth 3. Reduction in wound volume 4. Time of becoming culture negative. 5. Changes in levels of marker (MMP8). Timepoint: 3 Years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety efficacy and cost effectiveness.Timepoint: 3 Years

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmit Kumar Bhagat

King Georgeâ??s Medical University, Lucknow

drrnsrivastava@yahoo.com9415054330

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026