FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the cost of anaesthesia using two different methods

Comparison of sevoflurane requirement for proseal LMA with classic LMA in anaesthetized spontaneously breathing patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/09/004995
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-09-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- undergoing minor surgery

Interventions

Intervention1: Proseal LMA: patients were anesthetized with inhalation of sevoflurane in 66% nitrous oxide. Proseal LMA was inserted once BIS value was 60 or less Control Intervention1: Classic LMA: p

Sponsors

PGIMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 50 adult ASA I-II patients undergoing elective minor surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with history of gastro-esophageal reflux, sensitivity to volatile anesthetics, heavy smokers, having BMI > 1.5 times normal and predicted difficult intubation will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
total sevoflurane requirementTimepoint: At the end of surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recordedTimepoint: at 5 min interval during intra-operative period—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNeerja Bharti

PGIMER

bhartineerja@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026