FindTrial
Sign In

Comparision of influence of head and neck position on ventilation with two supraglottic airway devices (Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel)

Comparision of influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressures and cuff position with the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/09/004961
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-09-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- patients who are undergoing elective surgeries under ASA 1 or ASA 2

Interventions

Intervention1: change in position namely flexion, extension, lateral rotation: the positions are changed with both the I-gel and proseal LMA in situ and the outcomes recorded Control Intervention1: se

Sponsors

JIPMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and ASA 2 posted for elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients at risk for aspiration, limited head and neck movements,COPD, asthma or difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
oropharyngeal leak pressures Peak airway pressures delivered tidal volumeTimepoint: before and after the change in head and neck position—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
cuff position Airway morbidityTimepoint: scored by using flexible fibreoptic laryngoscope and Brimacome scoring after change in head and neck position compared with neutral. any airway related morbidity recorded after the study, followed up and managed appropriately. Study done in short mostly day care cases hence no long term follow up done.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Nawaz

JIPMER

jipmermishra@gmail.com9344668104

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026