FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of insertion conditions of a laryngeal mask airway under propofol-ketamine or propofol-fentanyl anesthesia

Comparative Evaluation Of Propofol-Ketamine And Propofol-Fentanyl For Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/08/004905
Enrollment
120
Registered
2014-08-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA 1 and 2 adults scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia

Interventions

Intervention1: Propofol-ketamine: Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg IV before induction and Propofol @ 1 mg/kg/min IV for induction of anesthesia until loss of consciousness Control Intervention1: Propofol-fentanyl:

Sponsors

Institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and 2 adults scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindication for LMA usage 2. History of allergic reactions to any of the study drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in insertion conditions for LMA insertion as assessed by a 6 variable, 3 point LMA insertion scoreTimepoint: Induction of general anesthesia and LMA insertion—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamic responses (blood pressure and heart rate) to LMA insertionTimepoint: Upto 10 minutes following insertion of LMA—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSatyen Parida

JIPMER, Puducherry

mohankumarrm@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026