FindTrial
Sign In

USE OF VIDEO TECHNOLOGY FOR SECURING ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (A TUBE TO HELP PATIENTS BREATHE) IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED CERVICAL SPINE INJURY

Comparison of McCoy Laryngoscope and CMAC videolaryngoscope in simulated cervical spine patients-A randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/08/004861
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-08-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: CMAC videolaryngoscope: intubating condition with CMAC videolaryngoscope Control Intervention1: CMAC videolaryngoscope with McCoy laryngoscope: intubation condition with cmac videlayngo

Sponsors

PGIMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification I and II, between the age group of 18-60 years presenting for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with hemodynamic or respiratory compromise and anticipated difficult airway having modified Mallampati grading (MPG) of IV or thyromental distance(TMD) < 6 cm were excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation difficulty scaleTimepoint: after intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All the perioperative data with regards to,cormack Lehane grading, time taken for glottic visualization, time taken to negotiate endotracheal tube, total time taken to intubate, number of attempts and the hemodynamic data .Timepoint: At intubation and hemodynamic data till 10 mins post intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDIVYA JAIN

PGIMER,Chandigarh

jaindivya77@rediffmail.com9855900171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026