FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of incidence of Ventilator associated pneumonia with two types of endotracheal tubes and evaluation of benefit

Comparison of the efficiency of polyurethane cuffed endotracheal tube with conventional endotracheal tubes on VAP incidence in critically ill patients â?? a randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/08/004831
Enrollment
80
Registered
2014-08-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Post laprotomy patients requiring mechanical ventilation

Interventions

Intervention1: Endotracheal Intubation: Intubation in patients who require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventuilation Control Intervention1: Endotracheal Intubation with conventional poly v

Sponsors

JIPMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Post-surgical patients who underwent laparotomy and who require mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours was included in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who are admitted with pneumonia or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) at the time of admission, significant co-morbidities and APACHE score > 20

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence/ development of Ventilator associated pneumoniaTimepoint: Development of ventilator associated pneumonia after 48 hrs of mechanical ventilation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of Ventilator associated pneumoniaTimepoint: Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia after 48 hrs of mechanical ventilation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suhas P

JIPMER

p_kundra@hotmail.com8300162663

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026