FindTrial
Sign In

A clinical trial to compare the efficiency of two devices,Macintosh laryngoscope and C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope for double lumen tube intubation in patients requiring one lung ventilation for surgery

Comparison of the C-Mac D-blade videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen tube intubation - MACD-DLT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/07/004777
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-07-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Double Lumen Tube placement in patients requiring Lung isolation for thoracic surgeries

Interventions

Intervention1: C-MAC D-BLADE VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE: USE OF C-MAC D-BLADE VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE FOR DOUBLE LUMEN TUBE INSERTION FOR LUNG ISOLATION Control Intervention1: Mc INTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE: Mc INTOSH LARYN

Sponsors

Dr Shagun Bhatia Shah
Lead Sponsor
Dr AK Bhargava
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA physical status 1-2 Patients requiring a DLT for thoracic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration Mouth opening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
â?¢ Time required for intubation(in seconds) â?¢ Incidence of complications -(Blood on deviceâ?¢Oral bleedingâ?¢Bronchospasm â?¢Arrhythmiaâ?¢Hoarsenessâ?¢DLT misplaced into wrong bronchusâ?¢DLT Cuff Damage) Timepoint: N/A—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES (HEART RATE,SBP,DBP,MAP) Timepoint: 1 MINUTE POST INTUBATION 3 MINUTES POST INTUBATION—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrShagun Bhatia Shah

Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre

shah.shagun@rgcirc.org9891769779

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026