FindTrial
Sign In

To Know the effectiveness of synthetic and bovine derived hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute in the healing of upper front tooth root area of bone.

An evaluation of potential efficacy of bovine derived hydroxyapatite and synthetic hydroxyapatite crystals as osteoconductive bone graft substitute - a comparative clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/05/004578
Enrollment
24
Registered
2014-05-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M272- Inflammatory conditions of jaws Health Condition 2: null- Patients aged between 15-45 yrs of either sex with periapical cyst or residual cyst of anterior maxilla, who required cystectomy and grafting were enrolled in the study.

Interventions

Intervention1: Bovine derived hydroxyapatite crystals: Commercially available Bovine derived hydroxyapatite crystals acquired from market. Control Intervention1: synthetic hydroxyapatite crystals: Co

Sponsors

Dr Vivekanand kattimani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy patients with periapical or residual cyst of anterior maxilla diagnosed clinically and radiologically. Who requirred cystectomy and grafting .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients. Patients with existing metabolic diseases e.g.diabetes. Patients with gross mobility due to moderate bone loss.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Enhancement of bone healingTimepoint: 8 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No infection, Complete bone regenerationTimepoint: 3,6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vivekanand Kattimani

SIBAR institute of dental sciences

pscomfs@gmail.com09392103703

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026