Skip to content

comparison of efficacy, saafety and cost effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine, anti-histaminics, in patient of urticaria

To compare efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, comparative, parallel group study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/04/004545
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-04-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

Interventions

Intervention1: olopatadine: antihistaminics used in condition urticaria.Dosage form -Tablet. Route of administration - Oral. Dose 5mg. Frequency - once a day at night.Duration of therapy - 6 weeks Con

Sponsors

Indira Gandhi Government Medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria 1) Those who were willing to participate in the study and comply with its procedures by signing a written informed consent. 2) Patients from Out-Patient Department (OPD) of dermatology between age group of 18 to 65 years of either sex. 3) History of urticarial wheal and/or angioedema for at least 3 days a week for 6 consecutive weeks with no obvious cause prior to inclusion in study. 4) Mean total symptom score (24 hour reflective) >= 3 at screening. This includes 1-5 number of wheals (score >= 1); at least a moderate severity of pruritus (score>=2). 5) Patients who were on any antihistamines except rupatidine and olopatadine were also included in the trail only after giving washout period of 7 days, irrespective of doses of the previous drugs. 6) Those who understood and agreed to adhere to the dosing and visit schedules, and agree to assess and record their symptom severity scores, medication times, concomitant medications, and adverse events accurately and consistently in a daily diary.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria 1) History of asthma or any other disease requiring chronic use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids. 2) Subjects with acute spontaneous urticaria or all physical and other subtypes of urticaria like aquagenic, cholinergic, contact and exercise induced urticaria 3) Had been unresponsive to antihistamine treatment in the past. 4) History of allergies to study medication or unable to tolerate antihistamines. 5) Use of study drug in the last 7 days prior to baseline and not willing to take washout period. 6) Pregnant female, nursing mothers. 7) Subjects with significant hematopoietic, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, neurologic, psychiatric or autoimmune disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the following aims and objectives: 1) To compare efficacy of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of CsU. A) Primary end point: To compare difference in mean total symptom score (MTSS) at baseline and six week.B) Secondary endpoint: a) To observe difference in average mean number of wheals (MNW), mean pruritus scale (MPS) and MTSS from baseline to end of one, three and six week.Timepoint: Six weeks study..patient will be followed at one, three and six week.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point a) Average change from baseline to end of 6 weeks treatment period in subjects 1. 12 hour reflective mean Number of Wheals (MNW) 2. 12 hour reflective mean pruritus scale (MPS) interference of wheals with sleep b) To observe difference in scale for interference of skin condition with sleep (SIWS) between baseline and six week. Timepoint: 6 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr SUMIT WANKHEDE

Government Medical College nagpur

gndakhle@rediffmail.com8308833593

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026