FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of efficacy of two surgical techniques used for treatment of receding gums.

Coronally advanced flap with a periosteal pedicle graft (PPG) VS sub epithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures: a comparative analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2014/03/004488
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Periosteal pedicle graft. Coronally positioned flap with connective tissue graft: Comparison of above mentioned techniques for recession coverage. Intervention2: 1)Periosteal pedicle gr

Sponsors

Manipal college of dental sciences
Lead Sponsor
Manipal College of dental sciences manipal
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients with Miller class I gingival recession on canines and pre molar on the maxilla. 2) Normal alignment of tooth in arch 3) Patients who can maintain good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Presence of root caries 2) Smokers and tobacco chewers 3) Systemically compromised 4) History of previous periodontal surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
amount of recession coverage, probing depth, attachment level. keratinized tissue height and width of attached gingivaTimepoint: The outcome will be estimated at 3 months and 6 months following the procedure—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative discomfort using visual analogue scaleTimepoint: At 2 weeks and one month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gazal Gupta

Manipal College of Dental Sciences

betsythomas99@gmail.com09448911388

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026