Skip to content

Comparison of two different types of splints (braces) in children with corrected club foot

DOBBS SPLINT VERSUS DENNIS BROWN SPLINTS IN CONGENITAL TALIPES EQUINOVARUS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2013/11/004125
Enrollment
48
Registered
2013-11-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Congenital Talipus Equinovarus

Interventions

Intervention1: usage of the Dobbs splint: splint to be used for 23hrs per day for 3 months followed by 12 hour for 4 years Control Intervention1: usage of Dennis brown splint: splint to be used for 23

Sponsors

Christian Medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Idiopathic unilateral or bilateral clubfoot, 2) After achieving the full correction of the deformity using Ponsti method i.e., the Dimeglio score of less than 5, 3) Ability and willingness to be followed up as per the protocol for clubfoot. Children will be entering the protocol at less than one year of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Neurolomuscular condition, arhtrogryposis and hyperlaxity,Hip or knee dislocation, any contraindication to splintage 2) Children from remote areas and outside India who may not be able to come for follow up 3) Surgery other than open tenotomy

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
failure of complianceTimepoint: complience questionare

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Maintenance of correctionTimepoint: correction measured by the Dimeglio score

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vrisha Madhuri

Christian Medical College Vellore

madhuriwalter@cmcvellore.ac.in04162282172

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026