To compare if spontaneous ovulation is better than ovulation triggered by administering human chorionic gonadotropin to improve pegnancy rates in gonadotropin stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles.

To study the effectiveness of spontaneous ovulation versus ovulation triggered by human choionic gonadotropin administration in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination in stimulated cycles. - Nil

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2013/07/003795

Enrollment

392

Registered

2013-07-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Infertile couples undergoing stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles

Interventions

Intervention1: Spontaneous ovulation as monitered by urine LH kit: The patients in the intervention arm will undergo urine LH testing daily once in the morning when at least one ovarian follicle reac

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age At least one patent tube as documented by Hysterosalpingography or Laparoscopy Semen analysis showing at least more than 10 million motile spermatozoa and normal morphology >4 %.(WHO1999)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age > 36 years Severe male factor infertility ( less than 10 million motile spermatozoa and less than 4% Kruger morphology)(WHO 1999) Moderate and Severe endometriosis(AFS III and IV)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical pregnancy rateTimepoint: March 2015	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Ongoing pregnancy rate Multiple pregnancy rate Miscarriage rateTimepoint: March 2015	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aleyamma T K

Christian Medical College and Hospital

draleyammatk@hotmail.com0416-2283301

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026