Skip to content

A study to compare two different types of surgeries for rectal cancer

A prospective pilot study comparing extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in low rectal cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2013/05/003661
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-05-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Low Rectal cancer

Interventions

Intervention1: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision: This is a modification of the standard abdominoperineal excision wherein the levator ani muscle is completely resected en bloc with the specimen

Sponsors

Ramakrishnan A S
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ECOG performance status 0-2 1.Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma lower third rectum (within 5cm from anal verge) who have received neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation according to the institutional protocol 2.Clinically staged as cT3-T4 and/or clinically node positive by preoperative MRI 3.Requiring abdominoperineal excision with a curative intent as indicated by a.Absence of malignant ascites or peritoneal dissemination except if confined to pelvic peritoneum and which can be resected completely b.Limited metastatic disease in the liver or lung which are amenable to surgical resection and are treated with a curative intent c.Local disease amenable for R0 resection, denoted by absence of pelvic side wall involvement on imaging. Disease involving the prostate or posterior vaginal wall will be eligible if R0 resection can be achieved by a sleeve resection of the prostate or posterior vaginal wall en-bloc.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: X Pregnancy X Acute myocardial infarction within the past 6 months. Patients who are status post-revascularization procedures with satisfactory cardiac function are eligible X Significant history of a medical problem or co-morbidity (e.g., severe congestive heart failure or severe pulmonary disease) that would preclude general anaesthesia and a major abdominal operation X History of psychiatric or addictive disorders or other conditions that would preclude the patient from meeting the study requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the rates of positive CRM, intra-operative perforation, specimen gradings and amount of tissue removed around the rectum in patients with low rectal cancer undergoing ELAPE as compared to standard APETimepoint: completion of surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare the intra-operative complications, blood loss, operative time and perineal wound complications between the two groups. 2. To compare the urinary and sexual function after surgery between the two groups Timepoint: 1 month and 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRamakrishnan A S

Cancer Institute(WIA)

ram_a_s@yahoo.com9840085569

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026