FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparative study of two different type of airway tubes in infants, for short surgeries

A Comparative study of LMA size-1 vs i-gel size-1 in infants undergoing daycare procedures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2013/02/003364
Enrollment
40
Registered
2013-02-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Lower abdominal surgery

Interventions

Intervention1: i-gel size 1: comparison of i-gel size 1 with laryngeal mask airway size 1 in paedriatric patients undergoing daycare procedures Control Intervention1: LMA size 1 versus I-gel size 1: S

Sponsors

Dept of Anaesthesiology Pain Perioperative Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA grade I/II 2. Weight 2Kg to 5 Kg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ASA physical status greater than II 2. Risk of pulmonary aspiration 3. Potential difficult airway 4. Children who require surgery in positions other than supine or lithotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Seal pressure achievedTimepoint: From induction af anaesthesia to awakening from anaesthesia—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Ease of insertion 2. Stability of the device Timepoint: From induction af anaesthesia to awakening from anaesthesia—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Archna Koul

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi

deepanjalipant@gmail.com01142252513

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026