Skip to content

Comparison of induction and recovery profile of thiopental, propofol, and etomidate for short surgical procedures

Comparison of induction and recovery profile of thiopental, propofol, and etomidate for short surgical procedures : A randomized controlled clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2013/01/003330
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-01-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- for short surgical procedures

Interventions

Control Intervention1: INJ PROPOFOL: 2.5 MG/KG INTRAVENOUSLY FOR INDUCTION Control Intervention2: INJ THIOPENTONE SODIUM: 5 MG/KG INTRAVENOUSLY FOR INDUCTION Control Intervention3: INJ ETOMIDATE: 0.3

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: This study was conducted on 60 patients of either sex in the age range of 16 to 60 years and belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) grade 1/2.Prior approval of the Instituteâ??s medical ethics committee was obtained. Informed written consent was taken from all the patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patients with known history of allergy to these drugs, hemodyna-mically unstable patients and unwilling/uncooperative patients with psychiatric illness were excluded from the study so also patients on drug therapy known to interfere with pharmacokinetics of these anesthetics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Etomidate was found to be the most rapidly acting induction agent among the three agents. This difference was statistically highly significant(P0.0001). The difference in onset of action between Thiopental and Propofol was clinically and statistically not significant.(Timepoint: Onset of action(induction time) for propofol was 20.15+-2.01sec,for thiopental 23.9+-1.41sec and for Etomidate it was 13.4+-1.63sec.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of pain on iv injection and respiratory depression was seen with Propofol. No major side effects were seen with Thiopental. Myoclonic limb movements and PONV was observed with Etomidate.Timepoint: Onset of action (induction time) was shortest with Etomidate followed by propofol and then thiopental;VAS in the three groups during 2 hours postoperatively did not show any significant difference.Timepoint: Mean VAS was 0 in thiopental and Propofol group and 0.1+-0.45 in Etomidate group.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Piyush Setu

Pad. Dr. D.Y. Patil medical college

pramod.velankar@gmail.com09422011042

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026