FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Non invasive ventilation strategies in preterm neonates

Comparison of non invasive modalities -nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates - RCT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2012/12/003241
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-12-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Neonates with respiratory distress

Interventions

Intervention1: NIPPV/NIMV: NIPPV was administered after randomization. ventilatory parameters were- PIP- 10-20cmH2O. PEEP- 4-6cmH2O FiO2- 21- 50% rate- 20-40bpm primary outcome was assessed during fir

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All preterm and late preterm neonates ( =3. Age limit is 0- 28 days of life

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Neonates with congenital cyanotic heart disease. 2. Neonates with major congenital malformations. 3. Neonates with air leak syndromes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is â??failureâ?? of noninvasive respiratory support, and necessitating intubation and mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of initiation of non invasive ventilator support.Timepoint: TIME LIMIT IS 48 Hrs—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. duration of respiratory support 2.duration of NICU stay 3.days to reach full feed ,Timepoint: during full stay at NICU—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Leslie Lewis

Kasturba Medical College

leslielewis1@gmail.com09449208476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026