FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing wound infection at stoma site between two different types of skin closure.

Wound infection after ileostomy closure: A prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. circumferential subcuticular closure techniques

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2012/01/002339
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-01-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- patients who have undergone abdominal surgery requiring ileostomy formation and now considered fit for stoma closure

Interventions

Intervention1: circumferential subcuticular wound approximation: circumferential subcuticular wound approximation is a pursestring technique of ileostomy skin closure whereby it has shown to have less

Sponsors

AIIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All consecutive patients undergoing ileostomy closure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who refuse to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the wound infection rate of primary closure vs circumferential subcuticular wound approximation after ileostomy closure Timepoint: 30 days—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the cosmetic appearance and incisional hernia rate of primary closure vs circumferential subcuticular wound approximation after ileostomy closure Timepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactsumesh kaistha

AIIMS

peush_sahni@hotmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026