FindTrial
Sign In

A study of Knee arthroplasty results in young, active patients to compare three different tibial implant designs.

Comparing metal-backed, All-Polyethylene and Rotating Platform Tibial Implants in young Active Arthroplasty patients.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2012/01/002318
Enrollment
256
Registered
2012-01-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Dr Rajesh Maniar
Lead Sponsor
Dr Ravi Mohan Nayak
Collaborator
Dr Tushar Singhi
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: inclusion criteria: 1. age 2. atleast 5 years post surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - All patients above 60 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
-clinical derived score: american knee society score (knee score & functional score) -Radiologic assessment using the radiological knee society score: component placement-femroal & tibial, presence of osteolysis if yes, which regions, patella position, bone surface coverage area by tibial component, hip/ankle/knee axis for alignment Timepoint: follow up date in next 1 year(5-9 yrs)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motion, anterior knee pain, anterior knee crepitusTimepoint: 5-9 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rajesh Maniar

Lilavati Hospital & Research Center

drmaniar@jointspeciality.com022-26483391

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026