Skip to content

A study to see the effects of Gabapentin and amitriptyline as adjuvant with other pain killer in patients with cancer pain

Role of gabapentin as adjuvant analgesic with opioids for neuropathic cancer pain when combined with low dose amitriptyline in cancer subjects of Tripura, a North Eastern state of India. - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2011/12/002182
Enrollment
80
Registered
2011-12-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Neuropathic cancer pain

Interventions

Intervention1: Gabapentin 100 + Placebo of Amitriptyline: BD for 15 days orally Intervention2: Gabapentin 100 mg + Amitriptyline 10mg: BD for 15 days orally Intervention3: Gabapentin Placebo + Amitrip

Sponsors

Indian Council of Medical Research
Lead Sponsor
Gautam Majumder
Collaborator
Partha Sarathi Sutradhar
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a. Age 18 years to 80 years b. Cancer Patients with neuropathic pain not controlled with opioid analgesics. c. Worst pain intensity >= 5 on a NRS from 0 â?? 10, in the 24 hour period to study entry. d. Stable dose of regularly scheduled systemic opioid therapy (Morphine >= 60 mg / 24 hour without sufficient analgesia for at least 24 hour. e. Life expectancy >= 30 days. f. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >= 40.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a. Serum creatinine 2 times the upper limit of normal. b. Serum liver enzyme 5 times the upper limit of normal. c. Serum sodium 130 m Eq. d. Unable to take medication orally. e. Pregnant and lactating subjects. f. Other organ dysfunction. g. Chemotherapy from 3 days before screening. h. Radiotherapy to the pain producing lesion from 15 days before screening. i. Patients unable to communicate fluency in Bengali Hindi or English. j. Patients with history of epilepsy or use of anti epileptic drugs or neuropathic analgesics other than opioids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
a.Pain score (burning and shooting) by Numerical rating scale (NRS) 0 â?? 10 using Brief pain Inventory (BPI) at day 0, 8 and 15 day after intervention. b. Assessment of interference of activity by pain during past 24 hour at day 0, 8 and 15 day after intervention Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The percentage of patients that achieved at least a one third reduction in their pain score {33% pain intensity difference (PID)}Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention;Amount of rescue opioid analgesics.Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention;Assessment of quality of pain relief by using â??Pain relief scaleâ?? (PRS) and â??Patientâ??s global impression changeâ?? (PGIC).Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention;Presence and absence of allodynia.Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention;Previous 24 hour opioid rescue dose.Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention ;Recording of average daily paroxysmal pain (shooting and Lancinating) episodes.Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention;Recording of toxicity based on four point scale.Timepoint: 8 and 15 day after intervention

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDebasis Ray

Agartala Govt. Medical College

contactdebasisray@gmail.com09436125100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026