Skip to content

To determine the efficacy, safety and ease of use of Lidocaine Lozenges as compared to lidocaine spray in patients undergoing diagnostic laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract.

An Open Label, Comparative, multicentric study to evaluate efficacy and safety of lidocaine lozenges vs local lidocaine spray in patients scheduled for diagnostic Laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2011/091/000155
Enrollment
200
Registered
2011-02-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- In patients scheduled for diagnostic Laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract.

Interventions

Intervention1: Lidocaine Lozenges- 100 mg or 200 mg: Lidocaine Lozenges- 100 mg or 200 mg unit is to be taken 15-20 mins prior to procedure Control Intervention1: Lidocaine spray equivalent to 100 mg

Sponsors

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients of either sex aged 18-80 years. 2.Patients undergoing diagnostic laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract. 3.American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical status I and II of patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.History of hypersensitivity to amide type lidocaine anesthetics or any component of the formulation 2.Patients with medical history of respiratory disease such as asthma, bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 3.Use of another topical product at application site 4.Expecting unusual surgical difficulty 5.Unwilling patients. 6.Emergency surgery/ surgery needing hospitalization 7.Clinically significant impairment of hepatic/renal/cardiac functions 8.Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, does not justify the patients inclusion in the study 9.Pregnant women and lactating mothers 10.Women of child bearing age not practicing contraception 11.Participation in a clinical study involving an investigational product within past 30 days 12.Patient known or, in the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the Clinical Study Protocol (e.g. alcoholism, drug dependency, or psychotic state).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of application of anaesthetic agent.Timepoint: On the day of diagnostic laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract. After the procedure is completed;Ease of application of anaesthetic agent.Timepoint: On the day of diagnostic laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract. After the procedure is completed;Ease of application of anaesthetic agent.Timepoint: On the day of diagnostic laryngoscopy and/or punch biopsy of upper aero-digestive tract. After the procedure is completed

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy of Topical analgesia as determined by ease of procedure Physician Global assessment side effectsTimepoint: After the completion of procedure

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sanjay Maroo

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited

sanjaymaroo@troikaapharma.com079-26856242

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026