Skip to content

To determine the efficacy and safety of 1000 IU/ ml topical solution of heparin sodium versus 200 IU/G heparin sodium gel in the management of post infusion superficial thrombophlebitis.

A randomized comparative study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of a 1000 IU/ml topical solution of heparin sodium as compared to a 200 IU/G heparin sodium gel in the management of post infusion superficial thrombophlebitis.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2010/091/002947
Enrollment
200
Registered
2010-11-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Post infusion superficial thrombophlebitis.

Interventions

Intervention1: Heparin sodium 1000 IU/G solution: Heparin solution should be applied in a thin layer in an amount sufficient to cover the phlebitic lesion 3 times daily (morning, noon and evening).Tre

Sponsors

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a)Patients in the age group of 18-60 years b)Patients of both sexes c)Patients on IV infusion d)Superficial thrombophlebitis Grade 2-4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a)Patients below 18 years and above 60 years of age b)Patients on anticoagulants c)Pregnant and lactating women d)Patients with any contraindication to heparin e)Mentally retarded patients f)Unwilling patients g)Patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation h)Patients with grade 1 or 5 phlebitis i)Application of other topical anti-inflammatory agent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Local Symptoms (Score of Pain, Score of tenderness, Score of redness, Score of raised local temperature, Score of venous induration) 2.Change in length of the venous lesion in millimeters. 3.Change in the grade of the lesion 4.Time taken to reach end point 5.Status of lesion at day 7Timepoint: 1. At Baseline and day 3 2. At Baseline and day 3 3. At Baseline and day 3 4. At day 3 and day 7 5. At day 7;1.Local Symptoms (Score of Pain, Score of tenderness, Score of redness, Score of raised local temperature, Score of venous induration) 2.Change in length of the venous lesion in millimeters. 3.Change in the grade of the lesion 4.Time taken to reach end point 5.Status of lesion at day 7Timepoint: 1. At Baseline and day 3 2. At Baseline and day 3 3. At Baseline and day 3 4. At day 3 and day 7 5. At day 7;1.Local Symptoms (Score of Pain, Score of tenderness, Score of redness, Score of raised local temperature, Score of venous induration) 2.Change in length of the venous lesion in millimeters. 3.Change in the grade of the lesion 4.Time taken to reach end point 5.Status of lesion at day 7Timepoint: 1. At Baseline and day 3 2. At Baseline and day 3 3. At Baseline and day 3 4. At day 3 and day 7 5. At day 7

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Local and Systemic Adverse eventsTimepoint: Throughout the study;Patients global evaluationTimepoint: Day 7 (At the end of the study);Physicians global evaluation. Timepoint: Day 7 (At the end of the study)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sanjay Maroo

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited

medicalservices@troikaapharma.com079-26856242

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026