Skip to content

A Single-Centre, Validation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Urethral Transplant in Patients with Urethral Strictures more than 1 cm in length

A Single-Centre, Validation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Urethral Transplant in Patients with Urethral Strictures more than 1 cm in length

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2010/091/000656
Enrollment
25
Registered
2010-07-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Male patients with urethral strictures more than 1 cm in length who have failed traditional Urethroplasty procedure(s)

Interventions

Intervention1: Autologous Urethral Transplant: Nil Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

DrKNSridhar SRI RESEARCH FOR TISSUE ENGINEERING
Lead Sponsor
Lotus Clinical Research Academy
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male patients with history of Urethral stricture > 1 cm in length at the anterior urethra 2. Undergone prior Urethroplasty or periodical dilatation and catheterization (more than 2 interventions in 1 year). The latest surgical procedure or dilatation should have taken place at least 3 weeks before study enrolment. 3. Age > 18 years 4. Willing to give Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with urethral Strictures less than 1 cm in length 2. History of any prior surgery with autologous urethral transplant 3. Diabetes 4. Bleeding Disorders 5. Malignancy 6. Positive for HBsAg, HCV, or HIV testing 7. Use of Steroids or other immunosuppressant treatments 8. Clinical evidence of Collagen Vascular Disorder 9. Nutritional disorders like Severe Protein Deficiency (serum albumin < 3 g/dL) 10. Severe anemia (Hemoglobin < 6 g/dL)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To establish the efficacy of the procedure, Urethroplasty using Autologous Urethral Trasplant. To determine efficacy by the absence of intervention in a six month period following UrethroplastyTimepoint: Clinical outcome will be considered successful ï?· If no postoperative procedure (including self intermittent catheterization) will be needed for a period of 6 months, post re-implantation. ;To establish the efficacy of the procedure, Urethroplasty using Autologous Urethral Trasplant. To determine efficacy by the absence of intervention in a six month period following UrethroplastyTimepoint: Clinical outcome will be considered successful ï?· If no postoperative procedure (including self intermittent catheterization) will be needed for a period of 6 months, post re-implantation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety of the procedure will be evaluated during the study.Timepoint: The secondary efficacy end points will be determined by percentage change from baseline to visit IX (end of 6months) in the ï?· Urine flow rate ï?· Post void residual volume ï?· AUA score (American Urology Association Symptom score) ï?· Quality of life Questionnaire score

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr.K.N.Sridhar
knsridharis@hotmail.com080-41076759

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026