Skip to content

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TOPICALLY APPLIED MOIST EXPOSED BURN OINTMENT (MEBO) COMPARED TO SILVER SULPHADIAZINE (SSD) PHASE-III CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL

A phase III, Randomized, Open label, Controlled, Multicentre, Clinical study of the Safety and Efficacy of Toppically Applied Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO) Compared to Silver Sulphadiazine (SSD) in subjects with Mild thermal burn injuries.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2010/091/000189
Enrollment
200
Registered
2010-06-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: MEBO (Moist Expose Burn Ointment): Made up of 5 components (Radix Scutellariae 4.50%, Rhizoma Coptidis 4.50%, Cortex Phellodendri 4.50%, Pheritima 1.80%, Pericarpium Papaveris 1.80%, Ol

Sponsors

Shantou MEBO Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.,
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Mild thermal origin burns (Superficial II Degree burns and total burn area for all burns on a single patient no greater than 15% of TBSA); 2. Male or female between 13 and 50 years of age; 3. Patient or patient?s legally acceptable representative is willing to provide voluntary informed consent; 4. Capable of understanding and willing to comply with study protocol requirements; 5. Agree to stay in hospital for the first 7 days of treatment; 6. Female of childbearing potential with a negative result from pregnancy test at screening who agrees to use an acceptable birth control method (hormonal or IUD) or abstinence throughout the trial; and 7. Subjects infected with MRSA can be included based on the opinion of the Investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with chemical, electrical, and radiation burns; 2. Pregnant or breast-feeding female; 3. Known or suspected allergies to any of the components of MEBO; 4. Subjects who in the opinion of the Investigator are not suitable for inclusion; 5. Subjects previously on any other topical treatment except SSD; 6. Any immune deficiency disorder, or known clinically significant organ or systemic diseases, such that, in the opinion of the investigator, the significance of the disease will compromise the subject?s participation in the study (e.g., severe retinopathy requiring laser therapy, terminal kidney disease etc.); or 7. Participation in another investigational drug study within 30 days prior to treatment start.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the safety of MEBO in comparison with SSD in the patients with mild thermal burn injuries, through the clinical laboratory report, physical examination, the invasive infection rate.Timepoint: 14 Days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the efficacy of MEBO in comparision with SSD in the patients with mild thermal burn injuries, through the assessment of analgesic effect, the wound healing time (days), the wound healing rate in 10 days and the wound healing qualityTimepoint: 10 Days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. A. Sivakumar
doctorasiva@yahoo.co.in044-25585322

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026