Skip to content

Phase III clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor(Peg G-CSF) versus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in nonmyeloid malignancies subjects.

Randomized, comparative, Phase III clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor(Peg G-CSF) versus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in subjects with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2009/091/001016
Enrollment
108
Registered
2010-01-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- NONMYELOID MALIGNANCIES RECEIVING MYELOSUPPRESSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY

Interventions

Intervention1: Peg G-CSF: NA Control Intervention1: Recombinant human G-CSF: Inj. Neupogen

Sponsors

Wockhardt Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion: The subjects included in the study should satisfy the inclusion criteria enlisted below 1. Adult subject of either sex between age group of 18 to 65 years with histologically confirmed non myeloid malignant tumors undergoing a variety of myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens 2. Cancer subject with a good performance status (ECOG grade 0-2) 3. Subjects with >= 20% risk of developing chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia. Subjects receiving chemotherapy regimens with intermediate to high risk for febrile neutropenia are eligible. 4. No serious abnormality of hepatic or renal function at screening. 5. Subject willing to sign the â??Informed Consent Formâ?? Exclusion: The following categories of subjects will be excluded from the study. 1. Subject with history or clinical evidence of serious benign medical illnesses including hepatic, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrine, neurologic, or hematologic disease as determined by the clinical judgment of the Investigator with or without specific investigations. 2. Subject with body weight 3. Current therapy with other investigational drugs or lithium. 4. History or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure. 5. Prior treatment with interferons, interleukins or colony stimulating factors (including G-CSF, GM- CSF, M-CSF and erythropoietin). 6. Subject who has been receiving radiation therapy within 4 weeks of randomization into the study. 7. Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation 8. Pregnant women, nursing women and women not practicing effective contraception. 9. Subject with known hypersensitivity to E-coli derived proteins or any component of the study medication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject with history or clinical evidence of serious benign medical illnesses including hepatic, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrine, neurologic, or hematologic disease as determined by the clinical judgment of the Investigator with or without specific investigations. 2. Subject with body weight < 45 kg 3. Current therapy with other investigational drugs or lithium. 4. History or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure (NYHA class III-IV). 5. Prior treatment with interferons, interleukins, or, colony stimulating factors (including G-CSF, GM- CSF, M-CSF and erythropoietin). 6. Subject who has been receiving radiation therapy within 4 weeks of randomization into the study. 7. Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation 8. Pregnant women, nursing women and women not practicing effective contraception. 9. Subject with known hypersensitivity to E-coli derived proteins or any component of the study medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary efficacy end point will be the duration in days of the grade IV neutropenia (defined as ANC â?¤ 500 /mm3) in the present chemotherapy cycle.Timepoint: 10 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary efficacy will be determined in terms of the following secondary end points: 1. Incidence of febrile neutropenia 2. Incidence of intravenous antibiotic administration 3. Incidence of hospitalizationTimepoint: 10 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ashima Bhatia
rchugh@wockhardt.com02226596203

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026