FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the predictability of IOL master versus ultrasound biometry for estimating the post-cataract surgery refractive outcome

Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes after calculation of IOL power using the IOL Master and ultrasound biometry.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2009/091/000290
Enrollment
30
Registered
2009-06-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: IOL master: Keratometry by IOL master technique Control Intervention1: Conventional Keratometry: Contact ultrasound technique for keratometry

Sponsors

Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: More than 18 years of age, Eyes with no H/o previous ocular procedure in either eye, Senile Cataract Grade-I to Grade-III, as graded with LOCS-III, Difference between K1 & K2 should be within 1.00 D & astigmatism is to be with the rule.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Corneal scar, Complicated cataract, Traumatic cataract, Total cataract, Dense PSCC, Vitreous hemorrhage, Retinal/foveal pathology, Uncooperative patient, Inability to fixate/nystagmus/eccentric fixation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
accuracy in predicting post operative refractive status as assessed by either technique i.e. IOL master and ultrasound biometry.Timepoint: 4 weeks after surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSujata Das
sujatadas@lvpei.org(0674) 3987999

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026