Schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD)
Conditions
Brief summary
The proportion of participants rated as more than minimally improved (CGI-I ≤ 2.5), assessed 4 months (±1 month) after two infusions of rituximab in the RITS-LONG trial. Improvement is evaluated relative to baseline symptom severity and functional status recorded in the RITS-LONG study.The results are compared to the historical placebo response estimated from the preceding RCT-Rits trial and presented separately by initial treatment group in the RCT-Rits (placebo or rituximab)
Detailed description
Clinical improvement (CGI-I): Proportion of participants rated as more than minimally improved according to Clinical Global Impression – Improvement, CGI-I (Guy, 1976) score of ≤ 2.5 at Time point 1 and Time point 2., Severity of illness (CGI-S): Clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) score, Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP): Clinician-rated assessment of overall functioning and disability (PSP score), Self-rated health (VAS-Health): Patient’s self-rated general well-being using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-Health)., Self-Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SNS) and Level 1 Cross-cutting symptom measure of global symptom severity (CCSM): Patient-reported negative symptom severity (SNS total score) and comorbid psychiatric symptoms (CCSM), Informant-rated improvement (I-CGI-I): Informant’s (e.g. significant other or close relative) rating of patient improvement using the Informant-CGI-I at Time point 1 and Time point 2, compared with placebo in RCT-Rits. CGI-I was not originally developed for informant assessment but used as such in the RCT-Rits trial., Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): A semi structured clinical interview for assessing symptoms and severity of psychotic disorders (Kay et al. 1987). PANSS will be assessed at Time point 1 and Time point 2., Biomarkers: Changes in relevant peripheral biomarkers., Patient and significant-other satisfaction and experience: Quantitative and qualitative assessments of satisfaction and experiences related to rituximab treatment, collected at Time point 1.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The proportion of participants rated as more than minimally improved (CGI-I ≤ 2.5), assessed 4 months (±1 month) after two infusions of rituximab in the RITS-LONG trial. Improvement is evaluated relative to baseline symptom severity and functional status recorded in the RITS-LONG study.The results are compared to the historical placebo response estimated from the preceding RCT-Rits trial and presented separately by initial treatment group in the RCT-Rits (placebo or rituximab) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical improvement (CGI-I): Proportion of participants rated as more than minimally improved according to Clinical Global Impression – Improvement, CGI-I (Guy, 1976) score of ≤ 2.5 at Time point 1 and Time point 2., Severity of illness (CGI-S): Clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) score, Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP): Clinician-rated assessment of overall functioning and disability (PSP score), Self-rated health (VAS-Health): Patient’s self-rated general well-being using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-Health)., Self-Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SNS) and Level 1 Cross-cutting symptom measure of global symptom severity (CCSM): Patient-reported negative symptom severity (SNS total score) and comorbid psychiatric symptoms (CCSM), Informant-rated improvement (I-CGI-I): Informant’s (e.g. significant other or close relative) rating of patient improvement using the Informant-CGI-I at Time point 1 and Time point 2, compared with placebo in RCT-Rits. | — |