Lupus Nephritis
Conditions
Brief summary
Objective 1a: to determine scRNA-seq differences within the full macrophage spectrum between arm 1 vs arm 2; the macrophage spectrum will be compared between baseline kidney biopsy and kidney biopsy at 3 months treatment
Detailed description
Objective 2a. numerically distinguish residential macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages in kidney tissue with spatial scRNAseq, comparing arm 1 vs arm 2;, Objective 2b: to assess histological response of intensified treatment (arm 1) compared to SOC (arm 2);, Objective 3: to assess if early histological response is associated with clinical remission after two years and identify innovative early response determinants (including tissue monocyte/macrophage phenotyping), Objective 4: to identify differences between LN, SLE and healthy subjects in peripheral monocyte phenotype by using bulk RNA sequencing and flowcytometric analyses, to be associated with scRNAseq data and clinical/biochemical parameters. To identify potential non-invasive urinary biomarkers of disease activity in the scRNA-seq data, to be tested in sequentially stored urine and/or serum from patients, Objective 5: attempt to render (repeat) kidney biopsy in LN obsolete by identifying reliable serum and/or urinary biomarkers that reflect tissue damage and treatment response;, Objective 6: confirm scRNA-seq identified macrophage markers immunohistochemically, identify spatial distribution (glomerular vs interstitial) and assess their predictive and prognostic use., Objective 1b: analyze rapid clinical remission of intensified treatment by proteinuria levels
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Objective 1a: to determine scRNA-seq differences within the full macrophage spectrum between arm 1 vs arm 2; the macrophage spectrum will be compared between baseline kidney biopsy and kidney biopsy at 3 months treatment | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Objective 2a. numerically distinguish residential macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages in kidney tissue with spatial scRNAseq, comparing arm 1 vs arm 2;, Objective 2b: to assess histological response of intensified treatment (arm 1) compared to SOC (arm 2);, Objective 3: to assess if early histological response is associated with clinical remission after two years and identify innovative early response determinants (including tissue monocyte/macrophage phenotyping), Objective 4: to identify differences between LN, SLE and healthy subjects in peripheral monocyte phenotype by using bulk RNA sequencing and flowcytometric analyses, to be associated with scRNAseq data and clinical/biochemical parameters. To identify potential non-invasive urinary biomarkers of disease activity in the scRNA-seq data, to be tested in sequentially stored urine and/or serum from patients, Objective 5: attempt to render (repeat) kidney biopsy in LN obsolete by identifying reliable serum and/or urinary b | — |
Countries
Netherlands